Go to and post there a new thread (or find an existing one) in the 'Beta Testing' category of the forum. Or maybe you just want to share your suggestion with developers? Anyway, there are several ways to let us know: Let’s imagine it happened - you spotted a bug.
#ADGUARD DNS TET HOW TO#
To become an AdGuard VPN beta tester, you only need a few things: the desire, the device on which you will install the app, and this link, by following which you will be able to download the latest beta or nightly version of AdGuard VPN! How to report a bug Want to become one? Here how you can do it. This would not be possible without beta testing and, more importantly, beta testers. What else can we test? Suggestions are welcome.There is an AdGuard VPN app for virtually every major platform out there, and we regularly release updates for all of them. I didn’t test any of the paid services, so can’t attest on their accuracy. If you got here, you read the whole thing, so that’s pretty much it.
#ADGUARD DNS TET PLUS#
That’s a big plus for these 3 services for that. Google offers a way to force Safe Search via DNS and only Yandex, AdGuard and CleanBrowsing enforced them. One of the things that are important when blocking access to pornographic content is restricting search engines - as they cache porn images on the results, bypassing the filters control. I would give them a -1 for making it easy to bypass their own filters. None of the other services tried to block access to proxies.
#ADGUARD DNS TET FREE#
When testing the top 10 free proxy domains, only OpenDNS and CleanBrowsing blocked all of them. There are many easy to use free proxies that should be blocked when you are filtering access to pornographic content.
Partial screenshot of the pastebin with the results (medium doesn’t make it easy to import a table): Testing free proxies Neustar and AdGuard were not good at all, missing even some of the popular sites. Neustar: 81% blocked (72 blocked, 16 not blocked)ĪdGuard: 55% blocked (55 blocked, 39 not blocked) OpenDNS: 89% blocked (79 blocked, 9 not blocked) Yandex: 93% blocked (82 blocked, 6 not blocked) Norton: 94% blocked (83 blocked, 5 not blocked) Only CleanBrowsing blocked them all, with Norton SafeConnect very close in second place by missing 5 domains: They were ranked on the search engines and easily found online. Out of the 88 porn domains, I expected all of them to be blocked. That’s how I got the 88 different domains. I also re-did the test with two other similar keyword that means “having sexual intercourse” in a less noble ways. The reason I skipped to page 15 was to get a few less popular domains. After page 6, I skipped to page 15 and kept collecting domains.
I pretty much went manually - page by page, getting each domain. I chose 88 different pornographic sites (the first ones ranked on Google & Bing for the keyword “porn”). * CleanBrowsing_FamilySafe ( 185.228.168.168 )Īnd tried to see if they would be able to block access to porn. I picked up 6 free Porn/Adult/Explicit content filters: Would they at least be able to do a good job there? Testing Porn Filters (the free ones) What about our children? If they were not able to block access to malicious domains, would they be able to block access to porn? I assume the majority of people using these services are actually looking to block access to adult content for their kids. To be fair to them, my testing was not very scientific as I only got a few random malicious domains from pishtank, malware domains and my email, and expected them to be blocked. In summary: they did not work as expected. On a recent post, I provided some details on a disappointing test with a few free DNS resolvers that were supposed to block access to phishing and malicious domains.
0 kommentar(er)
